Where: American History Museum, First Floor East display cases
When: closing September 2, 2019
If you're a fan of superheroes, make sure to see this display on their history. What started in comic books in the 1930s has become a major entertainment industry, including TV shows, movies, graphic novels, merchandise, etc.
Superheroes are now more diverse than ever; it's not just white he-men who are saving the "good people of [wherever]," now women and people of color are getting in on the act. Did you know that Wonder Woman is also known as Princess Diana? I'm sure this is common knowledge among superhero fans, but since I'm on the outside looking in (for the purposes of this blog) at that community, this was new information for me.
On display is the costume that George Reeves wore on the "Superman" TV show in the 1950s. Although it originally aired before I was born, I remember watching old reruns of it when I was a kid. It seemed a little hokey, and the special effects were nothing in comparison to today's movies, but the basic premise of good triumphing over evil was the same.
Verdict: Worth a look, if you're in the museum to see a larger show.
Monday, April 15, 2019
Sunday, April 14, 2019
The Women of World War I
Where: American History Museum, Third Floor East exhibit case
When: closing April 28, 2019
When one thinks of Americans serving in WWI, the image of a fresh-faced doughboy comes to mind, or, more realistically, the image of a young man with a thousand-yard stare, covered in mud from the trenches. What both of these pictures leaves out is the large number of women who also served during the "Great War."
Even before the U.S. entered the war, women volunteered with social service and religious organizations. Over 20,000 volunteered for the Navy Nurse Corps, and 13,000 filed the ranks of the Navy and Marine Corps, doing office jobs that freed up the men to fight. In the Army Signal Corps, there were 450 female telephone operators.
Of course, as women were nursing and administrating and signaling in the military, they were also fighting for the right to vote at home. I'm assuming that the work women did during the war, including taking over jobs at home that there were no men to do, helped lawmakers to see that they could be entrusted with the vote.
This display includes the uniforms of several women who worked, either at home or abroad, during WWI. As we head into the 100th anniversary of women having the right to vote, I'm hoping we see more of these informative shows that highlight the role of women in American history.
Verdict: If you're in the museum, be sure to give this a look while you're on the third floor.
When: closing April 28, 2019
When one thinks of Americans serving in WWI, the image of a fresh-faced doughboy comes to mind, or, more realistically, the image of a young man with a thousand-yard stare, covered in mud from the trenches. What both of these pictures leaves out is the large number of women who also served during the "Great War."
Even before the U.S. entered the war, women volunteered with social service and religious organizations. Over 20,000 volunteered for the Navy Nurse Corps, and 13,000 filed the ranks of the Navy and Marine Corps, doing office jobs that freed up the men to fight. In the Army Signal Corps, there were 450 female telephone operators.
Of course, as women were nursing and administrating and signaling in the military, they were also fighting for the right to vote at home. I'm assuming that the work women did during the war, including taking over jobs at home that there were no men to do, helped lawmakers to see that they could be entrusted with the vote.
This display includes the uniforms of several women who worked, either at home or abroad, during WWI. As we head into the 100th anniversary of women having the right to vote, I'm hoping we see more of these informative shows that highlight the role of women in American history.
Verdict: If you're in the museum, be sure to give this a look while you're on the third floor.
Thursday, April 11, 2019
Young Man in a Hurry
Where: National Gallery of Art, West Building, Main Floor
When: closing July 7, 2019
To mark the 500th anniversary of Tintoretto's birth, the National Gallery has launched a blockbuster show of his work, spanning his entire career. Some of the work on display has never been exhibited in North America before, and two of his works (the "Spring" and "Summer" paintings of a cycle of works depicting the seasons) have not been seen together in over 25 years.
It's a busy show, with crowds larger than the usual exhibit. You don't need tickets and there's no timed entry, but you may have to wait to read the wall notes or get up close to the art. Still, it's fun to be part of a big show.
Things start off on a promising note with the entry plaque: "In Venice, in the sixteenth century, each day broke abuzz with commerce and creativity." I'm not interested in time travel, but if I had to go back, I've now decided that 16th century Venice is my destination. The dominant painter of the second half of this artistic century was Tintoretto, who was both a great artist and a great businessman. No starving artist he! When he was young and little known, he gave away his works, thus gaining attention he would otherwise not have had. Later in his career, he focused on portraits of the high and mighty, who had plenty of ready cash to pay for his work.
One of the first paintings you see is a self-portrait of him as a young man. He looks as if he's been interrupted in his work, and is eager to get back to it. He's full of energy and life and the desire to prove himself. At the end of the show, there is another self-portrait, of the artist as an old man. He looks a bit tired, as if he's ready to rest. It's a great way to bookend the exhibit, to show Tintoretto's life in his work.
Verdict: This is a terrific show, and an absolute must see.
When: closing July 7, 2019
To mark the 500th anniversary of Tintoretto's birth, the National Gallery has launched a blockbuster show of his work, spanning his entire career. Some of the work on display has never been exhibited in North America before, and two of his works (the "Spring" and "Summer" paintings of a cycle of works depicting the seasons) have not been seen together in over 25 years.
It's a busy show, with crowds larger than the usual exhibit. You don't need tickets and there's no timed entry, but you may have to wait to read the wall notes or get up close to the art. Still, it's fun to be part of a big show.
Things start off on a promising note with the entry plaque: "In Venice, in the sixteenth century, each day broke abuzz with commerce and creativity." I'm not interested in time travel, but if I had to go back, I've now decided that 16th century Venice is my destination. The dominant painter of the second half of this artistic century was Tintoretto, who was both a great artist and a great businessman. No starving artist he! When he was young and little known, he gave away his works, thus gaining attention he would otherwise not have had. Later in his career, he focused on portraits of the high and mighty, who had plenty of ready cash to pay for his work.
One of the first paintings you see is a self-portrait of him as a young man. He looks as if he's been interrupted in his work, and is eager to get back to it. He's full of energy and life and the desire to prove himself. At the end of the show, there is another self-portrait, of the artist as an old man. He looks a bit tired, as if he's ready to rest. It's a great way to bookend the exhibit, to show Tintoretto's life in his work.
Verdict: This is a terrific show, and an absolute must see.
Tuesday, April 9, 2019
Girl Power
Where: Sackler Gallery
When: closing June 23, 2019
It's not just the National Gallery that has a big show up now. The Sackler has pulled out all the stops for its display of objects belonging to China's Empress Dowagers. Pictured is the most powerful Empress Dowager in Chinese history, Empress Cixi. Cixi was the power behind the throne for fifty years; she ruled for her son and for her nephew after him.
Although the position of women in Chinese society was far below the position of men, the Empress Dowagers lived pretty well. Their beautiful gowns demonstrated their high position. They were not subject to foot binding, so they could move about as they wished, even riding horseback. They had very valuable jewelry and other household items. Because the property was left to the imperial family at the death of an empress, there is a record of how they lived, and the status afforded them during their lives.
Although emperors had many consorts, there was only one empress. The only woman senior to an empress, was the empress dowager. So, it's good to be the ruler's wife, but it's even better to be his mother. Amazingly enough, one of the empress dowagers, Empress Xiaoxian, came to the royal household as a maid, and was elevated to empress when she gave birth to a son.
This fabulous portrait of Empress Cixi was painted by Katharine Carl and given to Theodore Roosevelt. He, in turn, gave it to the Smithsonian. The enormous frame is of camphor wood.
Verdict: This is a don't miss!
When: closing June 23, 2019
It's not just the National Gallery that has a big show up now. The Sackler has pulled out all the stops for its display of objects belonging to China's Empress Dowagers. Pictured is the most powerful Empress Dowager in Chinese history, Empress Cixi. Cixi was the power behind the throne for fifty years; she ruled for her son and for her nephew after him.
Although the position of women in Chinese society was far below the position of men, the Empress Dowagers lived pretty well. Their beautiful gowns demonstrated their high position. They were not subject to foot binding, so they could move about as they wished, even riding horseback. They had very valuable jewelry and other household items. Because the property was left to the imperial family at the death of an empress, there is a record of how they lived, and the status afforded them during their lives.
Although emperors had many consorts, there was only one empress. The only woman senior to an empress, was the empress dowager. So, it's good to be the ruler's wife, but it's even better to be his mother. Amazingly enough, one of the empress dowagers, Empress Xiaoxian, came to the royal household as a maid, and was elevated to empress when she gave birth to a son.
This fabulous portrait of Empress Cixi was painted by Katharine Carl and given to Theodore Roosevelt. He, in turn, gave it to the Smithsonian. The enormous frame is of camphor wood.
Verdict: This is a don't miss!
Sunday, April 7, 2019
Tintoretto-Adjacent Exhibits
Where: National Gallery of Art, West Building, Ground Floor
When: closing June 9, 2019
The big show of the season at the National Gallery is the Tintoretto retrospective (about which more presently), but there are two other, smaller shows that are also concerned with the artist and his times. Of course, they are not the blockbuster that the main show is, but they're also less crowded, and if you're a fan of prints and drawings, they have much to offer.
There's a misconception that Tintoretto just slapped the paint on the canvas, with little preparation. I gather this is due to his style of painting, which shows lots of hasty brushwork. Tintoretto was called an "impetuous genius"; the genius part is true, but the impetuosity is not.
Although Tintoretto had a lifelong engagement with drawing, his works are not well-known. This show sets out to remedy that situation, by showing the range of drawings he made, in preparation for his paintings. He worked out the positions of his figures; he copied great sculptures; he taught his pupils - all by drawing.
In addition to pen and ink works, there's also a one-room examination of prints in the period of Tintoretto's career. It's a little "add on" to the drawing show - just keep walking through, and you'll get to it. Although Tintoretto never did any printmaking himself, he did take inspiration from prints especially those of the mannerists, who were starting to emerge in the 1500s. And, of course, prints were made of Tintoretto's work.
Verdict: If you just can't get enough of Tintoretto, or if the history of drawing and printmaking is your interest, check out these shows.
When: closing June 9, 2019
The big show of the season at the National Gallery is the Tintoretto retrospective (about which more presently), but there are two other, smaller shows that are also concerned with the artist and his times. Of course, they are not the blockbuster that the main show is, but they're also less crowded, and if you're a fan of prints and drawings, they have much to offer.
There's a misconception that Tintoretto just slapped the paint on the canvas, with little preparation. I gather this is due to his style of painting, which shows lots of hasty brushwork. Tintoretto was called an "impetuous genius"; the genius part is true, but the impetuosity is not.
Although Tintoretto had a lifelong engagement with drawing, his works are not well-known. This show sets out to remedy that situation, by showing the range of drawings he made, in preparation for his paintings. He worked out the positions of his figures; he copied great sculptures; he taught his pupils - all by drawing.
In addition to pen and ink works, there's also a one-room examination of prints in the period of Tintoretto's career. It's a little "add on" to the drawing show - just keep walking through, and you'll get to it. Although Tintoretto never did any printmaking himself, he did take inspiration from prints especially those of the mannerists, who were starting to emerge in the 1500s. And, of course, prints were made of Tintoretto's work.
Verdict: If you just can't get enough of Tintoretto, or if the history of drawing and printmaking is your interest, check out these shows.
Thursday, April 4, 2019
Good Morning Vietnam
Where: American Art Museum
When: closing August 18, 2019
Prior to the 1960s, American art had become detached from modern life and politics. The Vietnam War forced artists to confront what was going on, and their collective response was one of anger. This retrospective of the artistic response to Vietnam is a large display of very angry art.
As we all know, Vietnam was the first televised war, and it brought the horrors of armed conflict into American's living rooms. I was reminded of a show I'd seen a while back on Civil War photography. That also brought the war "home" to civilians, and made it much harder for them to pretend that war is a noble endeavor - it's a (literal) bloody mess.
The artists protesting the war were a diverse group: women and persons of color, particularly African American and Hispanic artists who focused on the disproportionate burden borne by their communities, spoke out through their art. I noticed Yayoi Kusama's photographs of anti-war happenings - without the mirror rooms, you don't need to wait in line to see them.
The piece that stuck with me the most was Edward Kienholz's "The Non-War Memorial." He took surplus army uniforms and filled them with clay. They are laid out on the floor, like fallen soldiers. It's not a flashy piece; there's no blood or guts, but you are confronted with the reality of death.
Verdict: This is not an enjoyable or pleasant trip to the art gallery. But then, the Vietnam War was neither enjoyable nor pleasant for those who fought.
When: closing August 18, 2019
Prior to the 1960s, American art had become detached from modern life and politics. The Vietnam War forced artists to confront what was going on, and their collective response was one of anger. This retrospective of the artistic response to Vietnam is a large display of very angry art.
As we all know, Vietnam was the first televised war, and it brought the horrors of armed conflict into American's living rooms. I was reminded of a show I'd seen a while back on Civil War photography. That also brought the war "home" to civilians, and made it much harder for them to pretend that war is a noble endeavor - it's a (literal) bloody mess.
The artists protesting the war were a diverse group: women and persons of color, particularly African American and Hispanic artists who focused on the disproportionate burden borne by their communities, spoke out through their art. I noticed Yayoi Kusama's photographs of anti-war happenings - without the mirror rooms, you don't need to wait in line to see them.
The piece that stuck with me the most was Edward Kienholz's "The Non-War Memorial." He took surplus army uniforms and filled them with clay. They are laid out on the floor, like fallen soldiers. It's not a flashy piece; there's no blood or guts, but you are confronted with the reality of death.
Verdict: This is not an enjoyable or pleasant trip to the art gallery. But then, the Vietnam War was neither enjoyable nor pleasant for those who fought.
Tuesday, April 2, 2019
All About Oprah
Where: National Museum of African American History and Culture
When: closing June 30, 2019
This show is a biography of Oprah Winfrey. I'm going to assume that everyone reading this blog knows who Oprah is, and has at least some familiarity with her life story. She came from a very modest background, had no connections and made herself into one of the richest, most famous people in America by dint of hard work and talent.
It's an inspiring story, and I understand why the museum would tell it.
The question I have is, does the fact that Oprah has donated so much money to the museum create a conflict of interest? It seems wrong to say that if you give money to an incredibly worthy cause that the money should preclude your story being told, and there's no doubt that Oprah is one of the most influential African Americans in history. I just wondered what the ethics of the museum world are surrounding displays concerning their own donors.
Verdict: It's a well done display, and I'm sure even those who are big fans will learn something.
When: closing June 30, 2019
This show is a biography of Oprah Winfrey. I'm going to assume that everyone reading this blog knows who Oprah is, and has at least some familiarity with her life story. She came from a very modest background, had no connections and made herself into one of the richest, most famous people in America by dint of hard work and talent.
It's an inspiring story, and I understand why the museum would tell it.
The question I have is, does the fact that Oprah has donated so much money to the museum create a conflict of interest? It seems wrong to say that if you give money to an incredibly worthy cause that the money should preclude your story being told, and there's no doubt that Oprah is one of the most influential African Americans in history. I just wondered what the ethics of the museum world are surrounding displays concerning their own donors.
Verdict: It's a well done display, and I'm sure even those who are big fans will learn something.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)