Where: National Gallery of Art, West Building, Main Floor
When: closing January 21, 2018
Several years ago, there was a Vermeer exhibit at the National Gallery that was so popular they had to issue timed-entry tickets. If you missed that, or you'd like to see Vermeer without thousands of your closest friends, the new show on Dutch genre paintings at the National Gallery is just the thing for you. Although there is a rope set up quite a distance from the exhibit entrance and extra docents about to hand out brochures, I walked right in with no problem when I went at lunch time week before last.
It's not just Vermeer, but his work in company with other Dutch painters of the same period. They were clearly copying each other, as the same scenes and characters appear in several different works. I read a review that said Vermeer's pieces were clearly the best in each room, and that may well be true. I'll say I saw plenty to like, both by Vermeer and by others.
I started playing a game as I looked at the pieces, which I called "Where's the Dog?" So many paintings include a four-legged friend that it felt strange to see one without a canine representative. Most of the dogs were vaguely Spaniel-ish, so I felt right at home.
There's also a map of Delft from the Gallery's Library in a lounge area (I'd not seen a rest stop in a show before - perhaps also due to anticipated crowds?); nice to see something from the Library's collection make it into an actual show.
Verdict: Great way to see Vermeer without growing old in line.
Monday, November 27, 2017
Sunday, November 26, 2017
Hooray - the Sackler is Open!
Where: Sackler Gallery
When: closing January 15, 2018
The Sackler has been closed for renovations for several months, and I was very happy to see it reopen. This was my first visit back to my favorite museum, and I noticed one change in particular.
The show I saw dealt with representations of cats in Egyptian art, and it was a good, fun exhibit. Great for fans of Egyptian art, cat lovers and art enthusiasts generally, I enjoyed myself there.
Note: contrary to popular belief, Egyptians did not worship cats; rather, they identified certain qualities of cats with specific gods. They were intrigued by the duality of feline nature: on the one hand, nurturing, on the other hand, aggressive. Much better to be the beloved kitten than the hunted prey.
I noticed a photograph by Eliot Elisofon at the beginning of the show and remembered the exhibit of his works at African Art. There was also an actual cat mummy on display - you don't see that every day.
The thing that struck me was the change in the wording of the wall notes. I feel as if the language was simpler, less scholarly. Perhaps it's just for this one show, as it might draw more children? Perhaps it was my imagination? I'll have to watch closely at future shows...
Verdict: So glad to have the Sackler back, and the montage of modern-day cats was a nice touch at the end.
When: closing January 15, 2018
The Sackler has been closed for renovations for several months, and I was very happy to see it reopen. This was my first visit back to my favorite museum, and I noticed one change in particular.
The show I saw dealt with representations of cats in Egyptian art, and it was a good, fun exhibit. Great for fans of Egyptian art, cat lovers and art enthusiasts generally, I enjoyed myself there.
Note: contrary to popular belief, Egyptians did not worship cats; rather, they identified certain qualities of cats with specific gods. They were intrigued by the duality of feline nature: on the one hand, nurturing, on the other hand, aggressive. Much better to be the beloved kitten than the hunted prey.
I noticed a photograph by Eliot Elisofon at the beginning of the show and remembered the exhibit of his works at African Art. There was also an actual cat mummy on display - you don't see that every day.
The thing that struck me was the change in the wording of the wall notes. I feel as if the language was simpler, less scholarly. Perhaps it's just for this one show, as it might draw more children? Perhaps it was my imagination? I'll have to watch closely at future shows...
Verdict: So glad to have the Sackler back, and the montage of modern-day cats was a nice touch at the end.
Saturday, November 25, 2017
A Trip to the Renwick
I had some extra time one afternoon a couple of weeks ago and decided to spend it at the Renwick. The gallery is a bit far for a lunch time visit, and I was able to take my time and see three shows. I was surprised at how crowded it was - you'd think WONDER was still on.
When: closing January 28, 2018
The only way to describe the number of people at the "Murder is her Hobby" show is as a mob scene. It was actually difficult to see the dioramas, as there were so many people to contend with. These are murder scenes, based on actual crimes, created by Frances Glessner Lee, for use in training homicide investigators.
They are an interesting blend of womanly craft and manly crime solving, so quite modern. A macabre hobby certainly, but also a way for a woman to make a serious contribution to police work, in a time when that was not generally possible.
Apparently, there's a thought that Lee was the basis for Jessica Fletcher, the crime solving inhabitant of Cabot Cove, Maine, played by Angela Lansbury on "Murder, She Wrote." Not sure if that's true or not, or what Lee would have thought of the show, which I'm guessing was not a realistic depiction of police procedure.
When: closing January 28, 2018
This is an installation that looks like a subway stop, except the train never arrives. All it needs is a Metro sign, and it could be the Red Line. I caught myself looking for the third rail, in an effort to avoid it.
It's intriguing, when you stand by the side of the tracks, you can really imagine yourself waiting for a train, but I think the effect would have been enhanced if you couldn't just turn around and walk down the stairs back into the museum. If they'd made it more of a tunnel to get to the installation, that would have been better I think. As it is, it's quite good, so I'm nitpicking. There's also some "peepholes" on the other side of the installation that make it appear that you're looking at staircases in the station - very clever.
Large drop-off in crowd size from the crime scene dioramas, which rather surprised me. It's just one item to see, why not stick around and give it a look? I was happy to have a bit more room on the "platform," so this is not a complaint, just an expression of confusion.
When: closing February 11, 2018
Before the Renwick was renovated, the Grand Salon upstairs was just that: a room where artwork covered the walls. Now, most of what's happening is on the ceiling. The Grand Salon is now a place where people lie on the floor.
I wish they had chosen a different room for this activity. I don't know of another museum space with art displayed salon style here in DC (of course, I don't go to every museum, so perhaps there are many rooms like this, and I just don't know about them), and it would be nice to see a show set up this way. But, there aren't any other rooms to lie on the floor and look at art on the ceiling either (again, so far as I know), so I'll appreciate the opportunity to do that.
This show is the winner of the 2016 competition "ABOVE the Renwick," and it's interesting enough. The photograph is typical of what you see - if you move about, you see a slightly different angle and thus, a different work of art. I liked it fine, but I didn't walk away in awe.
Verdict: All three shows are worth a look; if you can find a time when it's less crowded, that would make the Lee dioramas much easier to examine.
When: closing January 28, 2018
The only way to describe the number of people at the "Murder is her Hobby" show is as a mob scene. It was actually difficult to see the dioramas, as there were so many people to contend with. These are murder scenes, based on actual crimes, created by Frances Glessner Lee, for use in training homicide investigators.
They are an interesting blend of womanly craft and manly crime solving, so quite modern. A macabre hobby certainly, but also a way for a woman to make a serious contribution to police work, in a time when that was not generally possible.
Apparently, there's a thought that Lee was the basis for Jessica Fletcher, the crime solving inhabitant of Cabot Cove, Maine, played by Angela Lansbury on "Murder, She Wrote." Not sure if that's true or not, or what Lee would have thought of the show, which I'm guessing was not a realistic depiction of police procedure.
When: closing January 28, 2018
This is an installation that looks like a subway stop, except the train never arrives. All it needs is a Metro sign, and it could be the Red Line. I caught myself looking for the third rail, in an effort to avoid it.
It's intriguing, when you stand by the side of the tracks, you can really imagine yourself waiting for a train, but I think the effect would have been enhanced if you couldn't just turn around and walk down the stairs back into the museum. If they'd made it more of a tunnel to get to the installation, that would have been better I think. As it is, it's quite good, so I'm nitpicking. There's also some "peepholes" on the other side of the installation that make it appear that you're looking at staircases in the station - very clever.
Large drop-off in crowd size from the crime scene dioramas, which rather surprised me. It's just one item to see, why not stick around and give it a look? I was happy to have a bit more room on the "platform," so this is not a complaint, just an expression of confusion.
When: closing February 11, 2018
Before the Renwick was renovated, the Grand Salon upstairs was just that: a room where artwork covered the walls. Now, most of what's happening is on the ceiling. The Grand Salon is now a place where people lie on the floor.
I wish they had chosen a different room for this activity. I don't know of another museum space with art displayed salon style here in DC (of course, I don't go to every museum, so perhaps there are many rooms like this, and I just don't know about them), and it would be nice to see a show set up this way. But, there aren't any other rooms to lie on the floor and look at art on the ceiling either (again, so far as I know), so I'll appreciate the opportunity to do that.
This show is the winner of the 2016 competition "ABOVE the Renwick," and it's interesting enough. The photograph is typical of what you see - if you move about, you see a slightly different angle and thus, a different work of art. I liked it fine, but I didn't walk away in awe.
Verdict: All three shows are worth a look; if you can find a time when it's less crowded, that would make the Lee dioramas much easier to examine.
Wednesday, November 8, 2017
Sometimes You Get What You Expect
Where: National Portrait Gallery, West Building
When: through January 7, 2018
As many exhibits of drawings as I've seen, I just can't warm to them. I think it's the fact that they're not terribly colorful, and pen and ink just doesn't do it for me. These are on loan from the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen in Rotterdam, and are from artists working in what is now Belgium and the Netherlands.
The earliest works, in the first room of the show, are from the 1400s. They are quite rare, only about 700 of them exist, so to see several examples is quite something. Although I can't say these are antiquities, they are really old - the discovery of North America by Europeans was decades in the future.
Farther on, there are two rooms with Mannerist works, which is great if you like Mannerism, which I can take or leave. I did like the Bruegel landscapes, so it's not as if there was nothing to catch my eye.
Verdict: Sometimes, I'm surprised at what I see at a show, but not in this case. If you like drawing, check this out. Otherwise, you can give it a quick skim, or pass it by entirely.
When: through January 7, 2018
As many exhibits of drawings as I've seen, I just can't warm to them. I think it's the fact that they're not terribly colorful, and pen and ink just doesn't do it for me. These are on loan from the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen in Rotterdam, and are from artists working in what is now Belgium and the Netherlands.
The earliest works, in the first room of the show, are from the 1400s. They are quite rare, only about 700 of them exist, so to see several examples is quite something. Although I can't say these are antiquities, they are really old - the discovery of North America by Europeans was decades in the future.
Farther on, there are two rooms with Mannerist works, which is great if you like Mannerism, which I can take or leave. I did like the Bruegel landscapes, so it's not as if there was nothing to catch my eye.
Verdict: Sometimes, I'm surprised at what I see at a show, but not in this case. If you like drawing, check this out. Otherwise, you can give it a quick skim, or pass it by entirely.
Monday, November 6, 2017
A Tribute to Dizzy Gillespie
Where: National Portrait Gallery
When: through November 26, 2017
I figured something would pop up soon with a closing date before the end of the year, and sure enough, here's a portrait of Dizzy Gillespie to celebrate the centennial of his birth.
It's in the "Celebrate" space, which you will doubtless recall is also the "In Memoriam" space. I make it a point to see these offerings as quickly as possible, as you never know when a famous person will die and you'll be out of luck.
The thing I like most about the piece is that Gillespie is pictured at an angle. It's an innovative way to show an innovative musician, and it's large enough that you feel as if you're in the smoky jazz club with him.
Verdict: Good portrait of an important American.
When: through November 26, 2017
I figured something would pop up soon with a closing date before the end of the year, and sure enough, here's a portrait of Dizzy Gillespie to celebrate the centennial of his birth.
It's in the "Celebrate" space, which you will doubtless recall is also the "In Memoriam" space. I make it a point to see these offerings as quickly as possible, as you never know when a famous person will die and you'll be out of luck.
The thing I like most about the piece is that Gillespie is pictured at an angle. It's an innovative way to show an innovative musician, and it's large enough that you feel as if you're in the smoky jazz club with him.
Verdict: Good portrait of an important American.
Saturday, November 4, 2017
The Art of Light
Where: Smithsonian American Art Museum
When: through January 7, 2018
There's a wild show up at SAAM, and each time you go, it will be different. It's a display of light art by Thomas Wilfred, basically colors and shapes in motion. Although you could watch some of the pieces from beginning to end, others take literally years to complete a loop, so no matter how often you visit or how long you stay, you'll never see the whole thing.
Wilfred started creating these pieces (for lack of a better word) in 1919, and people went to theaters to view them. I could not help but wonder, "Is this because they are mesmerizing works of art or because this was a new technology and they would watch anything, just to use it?" This is how I view most of 1950s television; people would watch plate-spinning because it was on TV, not because it was such gripping entertainment.
I'll say this, it's very conducive to meditation; you just watch the colors swirling, and pretty soon you feel calmer. I can see it working very well in office building lobbies. Note that, ironically, the space where the show is located is quite dark, so you might want to wait for your eyes to adjust before plunging in.
Verdict: It's intriguing in its own way; even if you're in the museum to see something else, it's worth walking through.
When: through January 7, 2018
There's a wild show up at SAAM, and each time you go, it will be different. It's a display of light art by Thomas Wilfred, basically colors and shapes in motion. Although you could watch some of the pieces from beginning to end, others take literally years to complete a loop, so no matter how often you visit or how long you stay, you'll never see the whole thing.
Wilfred started creating these pieces (for lack of a better word) in 1919, and people went to theaters to view them. I could not help but wonder, "Is this because they are mesmerizing works of art or because this was a new technology and they would watch anything, just to use it?" This is how I view most of 1950s television; people would watch plate-spinning because it was on TV, not because it was such gripping entertainment.
I'll say this, it's very conducive to meditation; you just watch the colors swirling, and pretty soon you feel calmer. I can see it working very well in office building lobbies. Note that, ironically, the space where the show is located is quite dark, so you might want to wait for your eyes to adjust before plunging in.
Verdict: It's intriguing in its own way; even if you're in the museum to see something else, it's worth walking through.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)