Where: National Gallery of Art, West Building
When: closing February 17, 2019 (tomorrow!)
I'll say right up front that I'm not a fan of Spanish sculpture. It's a lot of Mannerist figures, all elongated arms and legs, and lots of religious imagery. Just not my cup of tea. And Alonso Berruguete is apparently the person who started this all off. Not the religious subject matter, that was firmly established before he returned to his native Spain from a decade in Italy, but the Mannerist style.
If you're wondering what Mannerism replaced, it's something called Hispano-Flemish style. They had some examples on display, and I liked them. Much better than all that exaggerated emotional angst, and the crazy limbs as a physical manifestation of the agitation inside.
I will say, if you like enormous altarpieces, you should under no circumstances miss this show. When the wall notes say these are "monumental," they're not kidding. Even broken into pieces, you get a sense of the massive works these would be in a church. I couldn't help but think they'd give restive parishioners lots to look at, if the sermon got boring.
Verdict: Not my jam, but an excellent representation of this style.
Luncheon of the Museum Goer
Sunday, February 16, 2020
Sunday, February 9, 2020
A Different Picture of Iran
Where: Sackler Gallery of Art
When: closing February 9, 2019 (today!)
So if you've got a few minutes to spare today, run right over to the Sackler to see this exhibit of Iranian women photographers. These are portraits from the late 1970s to the present - not the Iran of the Revolution, but the Iran that has emerged afterwards.
The show opens with the video pictured here by Newsha Tarakolian. I thought at first it was a very large photograph, but it's a video - you can see the branches of the tree and the plastic bags moving in the breeze. The woman who is the subject of the portrait is holding very still - you have to watch very closely to see any movement at all. One of the guards and another visitor and I stood in front of the piece for several minutes, watching her - it's not for the impatient, that's for sure.
In the next room, Hengameh Golestan gives us photographs of the last days before the imposition of the chador. Seeing pictures of Iranian women outside without their heads covered made me view them as less "alien," less "other." They seemed like anyone I would see walking down the street here in the US. A reminder that underneath the chador, they are still like me.
A very interesting artist is Shadi Ghadirian. She constructs portraits of modern-day Iranian women taken in the style of the 19h century Qajar pictures, examples of which are also on display. You see them covered (again, the alienness) but with a Pepsi can, or a bicycle or a newspaper. Part ancient and part 21st century.
Malekeh Nayiny, who has lived in the West since 1979, explores the loss of her family and home by "updating" her family photos. The idea of not feeling at home either in Iran or outside of it is also the theme of Mitra Tabrizian's monumental photos. Those who stay idealize the West and those who leave feel disconnected. Both groups have a will to survive, but neither option seems comfortable.
Gohar Dashti's photographs of buildings overtaken by vegetation and devoid of people, and her Slow Decay series, which features expressionless people and uses blood as an accent in her photographs, show an alienation in contemporary Iranian society.
There's much more to Iran than what you see either in history books or on the news. This show gives you a glimpse of it.
Verdict: This isn't a huge show, so you get only a taste of each artist's work. Even that small encounter makes you realize there's more going on in Iran than you might think.
When: closing February 9, 2019 (today!)
So if you've got a few minutes to spare today, run right over to the Sackler to see this exhibit of Iranian women photographers. These are portraits from the late 1970s to the present - not the Iran of the Revolution, but the Iran that has emerged afterwards.
The show opens with the video pictured here by Newsha Tarakolian. I thought at first it was a very large photograph, but it's a video - you can see the branches of the tree and the plastic bags moving in the breeze. The woman who is the subject of the portrait is holding very still - you have to watch very closely to see any movement at all. One of the guards and another visitor and I stood in front of the piece for several minutes, watching her - it's not for the impatient, that's for sure.
In the next room, Hengameh Golestan gives us photographs of the last days before the imposition of the chador. Seeing pictures of Iranian women outside without their heads covered made me view them as less "alien," less "other." They seemed like anyone I would see walking down the street here in the US. A reminder that underneath the chador, they are still like me.
A very interesting artist is Shadi Ghadirian. She constructs portraits of modern-day Iranian women taken in the style of the 19h century Qajar pictures, examples of which are also on display. You see them covered (again, the alienness) but with a Pepsi can, or a bicycle or a newspaper. Part ancient and part 21st century.
Malekeh Nayiny, who has lived in the West since 1979, explores the loss of her family and home by "updating" her family photos. The idea of not feeling at home either in Iran or outside of it is also the theme of Mitra Tabrizian's monumental photos. Those who stay idealize the West and those who leave feel disconnected. Both groups have a will to survive, but neither option seems comfortable.
Gohar Dashti's photographs of buildings overtaken by vegetation and devoid of people, and her Slow Decay series, which features expressionless people and uses blood as an accent in her photographs, show an alienation in contemporary Iranian society.
There's much more to Iran than what you see either in history books or on the news. This show gives you a glimpse of it.
Verdict: This isn't a huge show, so you get only a taste of each artist's work. Even that small encounter makes you realize there's more going on in Iran than you might think.
Thursday, January 16, 2020
How Times Have Changed for Elephants
Where: Natural History Museum
When: closing February 1, 2020
This display is housed in the two glass cases on the ground floor of the museum, not far from the Constitution Avenue entrance. I can remember class trips from my elementary school days when most of the museum was housed in similar cases.
These materials show the change in society's view of elephants. They used to be considered fair game (no pun intended) for hunters, nothing more than giant beasts to be slaughtered for adventure or entertainment or umbrella stands.
Although hunting and ill-treatment still exists, and there's a debate about the morality of allowing hunting to further conservation, most people are more likely to shoot elephants with a camera than with a gun. Scientists bring back samples and data in order to further study elephants, rather than specimens to be displayed.
Theodore Roosevelt, a complicated figure in the history of conservation, gets a mention - his hunting expeditions provided over 23,000 animal specimens to the Smithsonian, as well as live animals for the National Zoo. The most famous elephant at the Museum was not obtained by Roosevelt. Henry has been on display in the main rotunda since 1959, and when he was installed, he was the largest land mammal on display in any museum in the world.
Verdict: An interesting display - a great way to complement a visit to see Henry.
When: closing February 1, 2020
This display is housed in the two glass cases on the ground floor of the museum, not far from the Constitution Avenue entrance. I can remember class trips from my elementary school days when most of the museum was housed in similar cases.
These materials show the change in society's view of elephants. They used to be considered fair game (no pun intended) for hunters, nothing more than giant beasts to be slaughtered for adventure or entertainment or umbrella stands.
Although hunting and ill-treatment still exists, and there's a debate about the morality of allowing hunting to further conservation, most people are more likely to shoot elephants with a camera than with a gun. Scientists bring back samples and data in order to further study elephants, rather than specimens to be displayed.
Theodore Roosevelt, a complicated figure in the history of conservation, gets a mention - his hunting expeditions provided over 23,000 animal specimens to the Smithsonian, as well as live animals for the National Zoo. The most famous elephant at the Museum was not obtained by Roosevelt. Henry has been on display in the main rotunda since 1959, and when he was installed, he was the largest land mammal on display in any museum in the world.
Verdict: An interesting display - a great way to complement a visit to see Henry.
Monday, January 13, 2020
Nothing Better on a Winter Day
Where: American History Museum
When: closing January 20, 2020
From the 1870s through the 1920s, silk manufacturing increased, while silk prices fell, and American women made a lot of quilts. It was a way for them to express their individual imagination - to be artists in a way that was permissible in a society that frowned upon female expression. And it was a way for them to decorate their parlors.
In case you don't know, silk is a filament extruded by a silkworm as it creates the cocoon where it will mature from a caterpillar to a moth. Fun fact!
Quilts were made with pieces of silk left over from the dress-making process. Early on, women made quilts in elaborate patterns. Of those on display, I thought they were the nicest. As time passed, crazy quilts came into fashion - no pattern necessary, which allowed for more artistic license.
The Museum houses the National Quilt Collection (I didn't even know there was such a thing until this week), with over 500 examples of American handmade quilts and quilt-related items. Only a fraction of those items are on display in this show, in part because they are fragile.
Verdict: If you're a fan of needlework, this is a must see.
When: closing January 20, 2020
From the 1870s through the 1920s, silk manufacturing increased, while silk prices fell, and American women made a lot of quilts. It was a way for them to express their individual imagination - to be artists in a way that was permissible in a society that frowned upon female expression. And it was a way for them to decorate their parlors.
In case you don't know, silk is a filament extruded by a silkworm as it creates the cocoon where it will mature from a caterpillar to a moth. Fun fact!
Quilts were made with pieces of silk left over from the dress-making process. Early on, women made quilts in elaborate patterns. Of those on display, I thought they were the nicest. As time passed, crazy quilts came into fashion - no pattern necessary, which allowed for more artistic license.
The Museum houses the National Quilt Collection (I didn't even know there was such a thing until this week), with over 500 examples of American handmade quilts and quilt-related items. Only a fraction of those items are on display in this show, in part because they are fragile.
Verdict: If you're a fan of needlework, this is a must see.
Friday, January 10, 2020
It's Amazing What a Little Chalk Will Do
Where: National Gallery of Art, West Building
When: closing January 26, 2020
This display of pastels is not getting the publicity of the Verrocchio exhibit upstairs on the Main Floor, but if you're at the National Gallery before the end of the month, it's well worth a visit. The introductory wall notes tell me that pastel is one of the most versatile and beautiful materials in the history of art, and I cannot disagree. Plus, these fragile works are almost never on display, so if you don't see them now, you may never get another opportunity!
Pastel is a sort of artificial chalk - it's made of pigment, white opaque filler and binder, then shaped into sticks and dried. A case of pastels given by Mary Cassatt (one of my favorite artists) to a friend is on display, so you can see exactly what a pastel is.
The show is arranged chronologically; the first room is full of 18th century French portraits that look very much like painting. Everything's very ornate and formal and exquisite. One expects Louis XIV to stroll in at any moment.
In the second room, we move onto 19th century England, where the pastels are more like drawings. We see landscapes, and the verdure of the English countryside. We're not completely done with the French, however, as there are a large number of Degas dancers.
In the final room (this is not a terribly large show), we move into the 20th century and modern art. There's a Roy Lichtenstein and a Jasper Johns on display. Some of the works are more like painting and some are more like drawing. The piece I liked the best was William Merritt Chase's "Study of Flesh Color and Gold." It's a beautiful combination of fine, precise drawing of a model, with a blurred, painting-like background. Captivating.
Verdict: This is a very interesting show, that's small enough to see easily in a lunch hour. The interactive screens in the first two rooms allow for much closer examination of the pastel techniques. One hopes the National Gallery is planning to do more of this in future.
When: closing January 26, 2020
This display of pastels is not getting the publicity of the Verrocchio exhibit upstairs on the Main Floor, but if you're at the National Gallery before the end of the month, it's well worth a visit. The introductory wall notes tell me that pastel is one of the most versatile and beautiful materials in the history of art, and I cannot disagree. Plus, these fragile works are almost never on display, so if you don't see them now, you may never get another opportunity!
Pastel is a sort of artificial chalk - it's made of pigment, white opaque filler and binder, then shaped into sticks and dried. A case of pastels given by Mary Cassatt (one of my favorite artists) to a friend is on display, so you can see exactly what a pastel is.
The show is arranged chronologically; the first room is full of 18th century French portraits that look very much like painting. Everything's very ornate and formal and exquisite. One expects Louis XIV to stroll in at any moment.
In the second room, we move onto 19th century England, where the pastels are more like drawings. We see landscapes, and the verdure of the English countryside. We're not completely done with the French, however, as there are a large number of Degas dancers.
In the final room (this is not a terribly large show), we move into the 20th century and modern art. There's a Roy Lichtenstein and a Jasper Johns on display. Some of the works are more like painting and some are more like drawing. The piece I liked the best was William Merritt Chase's "Study of Flesh Color and Gold." It's a beautiful combination of fine, precise drawing of a model, with a blurred, painting-like background. Captivating.
Verdict: This is a very interesting show, that's small enough to see easily in a lunch hour. The interactive screens in the first two rooms allow for much closer examination of the pastel techniques. One hopes the National Gallery is planning to do more of this in future.
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
The Reality Behind the Legend
Where: National Postal Museum
When: closing January 26, 2020
This is the second of two shows I saw last week at the Postal Museum. I find it a bit difficult to believe that something about the Pony Express won't always be part of their display, since it is really the most exciting part of postal history. Perhaps they're closing it to refresh it?
The legend of the Pony Express is a romanticization of a far less glamorous reality. The service ran between St. Joseph, MO and Sacramento, CA for not quite two years, in 1860 and 1861. It was a way to guarantee Union control over communications between California and the eastern part of the United States, as it did not travel through the South. A dangerous and uncomfortable job was made into the stuff of adventure in Wild West shows in the last 19th century.
Verdict: It's an interesting small show that would appeal to kids - a Q&A section is geared to them, and the family I saw there was enjoying themselves.
When: closing January 26, 2020
This is the second of two shows I saw last week at the Postal Museum. I find it a bit difficult to believe that something about the Pony Express won't always be part of their display, since it is really the most exciting part of postal history. Perhaps they're closing it to refresh it?
The legend of the Pony Express is a romanticization of a far less glamorous reality. The service ran between St. Joseph, MO and Sacramento, CA for not quite two years, in 1860 and 1861. It was a way to guarantee Union control over communications between California and the eastern part of the United States, as it did not travel through the South. A dangerous and uncomfortable job was made into the stuff of adventure in Wild West shows in the last 19th century.
Verdict: It's an interesting small show that would appeal to kids - a Q&A section is geared to them, and the family I saw there was enjoying themselves.
Monday, January 6, 2020
Diplomacy Behind the Scenes
Where: National Postal Museum
When: closing January 26, 2020
I'm writing this on January 1, 2020, so I'll wish all my readers a Happy New Year and a happy new decade. It's odd to think we're now living in the Twenties; let's hope there's just as much fun, but not so much depression, as in the 20th century version.
I went over to the Postal Museum this week, and saw two shows. The first was this one on diplomatic couriers. It's typical of their displays - full of information and well laid out, but I'm not sure that it's worth a trip over to Union Station to see. Every so often, I toy with the idea of dropping this venue from my list of places to visit, and then I feel bad - who else will go if I don't? And, every once in a great while, there's something really terrific, so it stays on the list.
Diplomatic couriers have been around in their current form for 100 years, hence the exhibit. The service was established in Paris in 1918, to support the American Commission to Negotiate Peace, although couriers for sensitive materials have been used since the Revolutionary War. There are now 100 badged couriers who send pouches, large and small, to over 275 diplomatic missions worldwide.
Verdict: I enjoyed looking at the "then and now" photos that show how the service has changed over a century, but I'm not sure I can recommend a special trip to see this, unless you're a great fan of postal history.
When: closing January 26, 2020
I'm writing this on January 1, 2020, so I'll wish all my readers a Happy New Year and a happy new decade. It's odd to think we're now living in the Twenties; let's hope there's just as much fun, but not so much depression, as in the 20th century version.
I went over to the Postal Museum this week, and saw two shows. The first was this one on diplomatic couriers. It's typical of their displays - full of information and well laid out, but I'm not sure that it's worth a trip over to Union Station to see. Every so often, I toy with the idea of dropping this venue from my list of places to visit, and then I feel bad - who else will go if I don't? And, every once in a great while, there's something really terrific, so it stays on the list.
Diplomatic couriers have been around in their current form for 100 years, hence the exhibit. The service was established in Paris in 1918, to support the American Commission to Negotiate Peace, although couriers for sensitive materials have been used since the Revolutionary War. There are now 100 badged couriers who send pouches, large and small, to over 275 diplomatic missions worldwide.
Verdict: I enjoyed looking at the "then and now" photos that show how the service has changed over a century, but I'm not sure I can recommend a special trip to see this, unless you're a great fan of postal history.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)